By /

A System in Crisis:
Deconstructing Sierra Leone's Garbage and Plastic Waste Catastrophe

Introduction: Beyond the Piles of Trash

While the visible heaps of uncollected waste on the streets of Freetown and other urban areas are the most immediate symptom, Sierra Leone’s garbage and plastic waste problem is not merely an issue of litter. It is a profound systemic failure, rooted in a complex interplay of historical legacies, rapid urbanization, economic fragility, and weak governance. This analysis moves beyond the surface to deconstruct the institutional, economic, and social dimensions of a crisis that poses a direct threat to public health, economic development, and environmental resilience.

The Anatomy of the Crisis:
A Multi-Dimensional Problem

The Scale and Composition:
Sierra Leone, particularly its capital Freetown, generates an estimated 1,000-1,500 tonnes of waste daily, with plastics constituting a significant and growing portion. The problem is exacerbated by the widespread use of non-biodegradable, single-use plastic sachets (for water, medicine, and food) and bottles, which are cheap and accessible but have no functional waste management system to handle them.

The Visible Consequences:
Streets, markets and gutters carpeted with water-sachet films and plastic bags. Overflowing dumpsites spilling into neighbourhoods, rivers and beaches. Flash floods after heavy rains as blocked drains back up. Acrid smoke from open burning; livestock and scavengers foraging in plastic.

Public Health Emergency:
Clogged drainage systems, a direct result of plastic waste, are a primary cause of devastating annual flooding during the rainy season. These floods displace thousands and create stagnant water, breeding grounds for mosquitoes that spread malaria and dengue fever. The decomposition of organic waste mixed with plastics leads to contamination of water sources, causing waterborne diseases like cholera and typhoid.

Environmental Degradation:
Plastic waste chokes rivers, mangrove forests, and the iconic Atlantic coastline. This harms marine biodiversity, damages fisheries (a key protein source and livelihood), and devastates the aesthetic value of beaches, negatively impacting the nascent tourism industry.

The “Toxic” Smoke:
The common practice of burning waste in open pits or on street corners to reduce volume releases a cocktail of toxic fumes (dioxins, furans) into the air, contributing to respiratory illnesses and long-term environmental pollution.

Analytical Deconstruction:
The Root Causes of Systemic Failure

An analytical approach reveals that the visible waste is a symptom of deeper, interconnected failures:

Institutional and Governance Failure:

Legacy of Conflict and Weak Institutions:
The decade-long civil war (1991-2002) decimated state institutions and infrastructure. The subsequent focus on post-conflict rebuilding has often struggled to keep pace with the explosive growth of urban populations and their waste.

Fragmented Responsibility and Underfunding:
Waste management is typically the mandate of city councils like the Freetown City Council (FCC), but they are critically underfunded. They lack the fleet of trucks, equipment, and financial resources to provide consistent, city-wide collection services. There is often a disconnect between national policy and local implementation capacity.

Weak Regulation and Enforcement:
While policies and laws may exist on paper (e.g., against illegal dumping), enforcement is minimal to non-existent. There is no strong regulatory framework for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) that would hold manufacturers accountable for the lifecycle of their plastic packaging.

Economic and Infrastructural Drivers:

The “Sachet Economy”: 
The economy is dominated by low-income consumers for whom small, single-use plastic sachets are the most affordable way to access essential goods like drinking water. This creates a perverse cycle: the packaging that is most economically accessible is also the most environmentally destructive and least economically viable to collect and recycle.

Collapse of Formal Collection:
The formal waste collection system is ineffective and cannot reach many informal settlements, which are often built on precarious, hard-to-access land.
This leaves a vacuum filled by informal, and often hazardous, practices.

An Immature Recycling Market:
The informal sector of waste pickers (often children and the most vulnerable) does exist, collecting valuable materials like metals and PET bottles. However, a formal recycling industry for low-value plastics (like sachets) is virtually non-existent due to a lack of investment, technology, and economic incentives.

Socio-Cultural and Behavioral Factors

Rapid, Unplanned Urbanization: 
Freetown’s population has swelled far beyond its planned capacity, with many residents living in informal settlements that lack basic services like waste collection. The infrastructure has not kept pace with demographic growth.

Lack of Public Awareness and Alternative Systems:
While there is a general understanding that waste is a problem, decades of inadequate disposal options have normalized dumping and burning. In the absence of a reliable, convenient municipal system, these practices become the default option for survival.

Case in Point:
The 2017 Mudslides and Recurring Floods

The 2017 Regent mudslide, which killed over 1,000 people, serves as a tragic case study. While triggered by torrential rain, the disaster was profoundly exacerbated by environmental degradation. Deforestation on hillsides, combined with drainage systems clogged by plastic waste, increased runoff and destabilized the soil. This event starkly illustrates how a waste management failure can escalate into a national humanitarian catastrophe.

Emerging Responses and the Path Forward:
An Uphill Battle

Analysis of the solutions reveals the scale of the challenge:

Freetown’s “Transform Freetown” Agenda:
The FCC has launched initiatives like the “Freetown the Tree Town” campaign and localized clean-up efforts. While commendable, these are often hampered by the same systemic lack of funding and capacity.

Community and NGO Initiatives:
Grassroots organizations and international NGOs are crucial, organizing clean-ups, running public awareness campaigns, and piloting small-scale recycling projects. However, these are often fragmented and lack the scale to match the problem.

The Need for a Systems-Level Solution: 
A sustainable solution requires a coordinated, multi-pronged approach.

Investment in Core Infrastructure:
Significant public and private investment is needed in waste collection vehicles, transfer stations, and the development of engineered sanitary landfills.

Policy and Economic Instruments:
Implementing and enforcing a plastic tax or ban on specific single-use items, and developing a viable EPR scheme to fund waste management.

Stimulating a Circular Economy:
Creating economic incentives for plastic collection and recycling, potentially by supporting industries that use waste plastic as a raw material (e.g., in construction).

Integrated Public Communication:
A sustained, nationwide campaign to change public behavior, coupled with the provision of viable alternatives.

Conclusion

The garbage and plastic waste problem in Sierra Leone is a critical bottleneck to its development and a direct threat to the well-being of its citizens. It is not a simple issue of cleanliness but a complex crisis of governance, economics, and infrastructure. Solving it requires moving beyond ad-hoc clean-ups to a fundamental restructuring of the waste management system, backed by political will, significant investment, and a collaborative effort between government, the private sector, and communities. The piles of waste on the streets are a visible testament to a broken system; addressing them is essential for building a healthier, more resilient, and prosperous Sierra Leone.

Get in touch with us
Scroll to Top
Call Now Button